Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 38.4 points higher (52.4 vs 14.0) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 52.4 | +274.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $5,786.78 | +2211.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 23× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.93s | 40.70s | +586.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 586.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 274.3% more intelligence, 2211.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 586.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill