Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 12.5 points higher (26.5 vs 14.0) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 26.5 | +89.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 89.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $286.07 | +14.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 14.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.86s | 6.31s | +7.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 7.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 89.3% more intelligence, 14.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill