Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGrok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.07.2−48.6% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 48.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$250.37Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.89s86.55s+1369.4% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 1369.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.25 / $2.50$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill