Grok 4.3 (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.3 (High): 52.2% more intelligence, 69.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 99.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 37.9 | +52.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 52.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $109.55 | −69.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 69.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.88s | 49.53s | +99.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 99.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.3 (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill