Grok 4.3 (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (high) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (high) scores 16.5 points higher (37.6 vs 21.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($288 vs $247; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.6 | 21.1 | −43.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $287.64 | $247.26 | −14.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 14.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.24s | 6.61s | −75.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 75.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 4.3 (high): 43.9% less intelligence, 14.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 46.10 for $275.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Grok 4.3 (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill