Grok 4.3 (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (high) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.3 (high)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 4.3 (high): 60.2% less intelligence, 43.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.4 | 10.1 | −60.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $332.00 | $476.03 | +43.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.27s | 5.52s | −77.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.3 (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill