Grok 4.5 (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 29.5 points higher (38.8 vs 9.3) but costs 28× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.8 | 9.3 | −76.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 76.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,243.85 | $43.98 | −96.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 96.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.45s | 10.45s | −46.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 46.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4.5 (High): 76.0% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Grok 4.5 (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill