Grok 4.5 (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 13.6 points higher (52.4 vs 38.8) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1244; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 38.8, and Grok 4.5 (High) when 38.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.8 | 52.4 | +35.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 35.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,243.85 | $5,786.78 | +365.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 40.70s | +116.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 116.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.5 (High): 35.1% more intelligence, 365.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 116.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.5 (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill