Grok 4.5 (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (high) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (high) scores 32.7 points higher (53.8 vs 21.1) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($602 vs $247; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.5 (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.8 | 21.1 | −60.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $602.49 | $247.26 | −59.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 59.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.98s | 6.61s | −52.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 4.5 (high): 60.8% less intelligence, 59.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (high) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Grok 4.5 (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill