Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (Low)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 26.5% less intelligence, 61.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 249.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 25.8 | −26.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 26.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $992.88 | +61.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 61.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.36s | 46.75s | +249.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 249.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill