Grok 4.6 (low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (low) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (low)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.6 (low): 25.7% less intelligence, 30.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 171.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.4 | 26.3 | −25.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 25.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $760.75 | $992.88 | +30.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 30.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.16s | 41.22s | +171.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 171.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.6 (low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill