Grok 4.6 (Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 21.7% more intelligence, 53.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 42.7 | +21.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 21.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $283.18 | −53.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 53.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.02s | 22.62s | +73.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 73.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.6 (Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill