Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 29.1 points higher (35.1 vs 6.0) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 6.0 | −82.9% Ministral 3 14B is 82.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $37.56 | −93.9% Ministral 3 14B is 93.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.31s | 7.92s | −40.5% Ministral 3 14B is 40.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 82.9% less intelligence, 93.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill