Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Ministral 3 8B
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Ministral 3 8B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 29.6 points higher (35.1 vs 5.5) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $27.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Ministral 3 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 5.5 | −84.3% Ministral 3 8B is 84.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $27.47 | −95.5% Ministral 3 8B is 95.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.25s | 5.26s | −60.3% Ministral 3 8B is 60.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.15 / $0.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 8B vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 84.3% less intelligence, 95.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Ministral 3 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/ministral-3-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/ministral-3-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill