Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 3.3 points higher (38.4 vs 35.1) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 38.4 | +9.4% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 9.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $1,607.86 | +161.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 24.31s | +78.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 78.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 9.4% more intelligence, 161.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill