Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (Low)
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 4.0% less intelligence, 183.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 33.7 | −4.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 4.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $1,737.18 | +183.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.02s | 21.12s | +62.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 62.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill