Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 15.8 points higher (42.8 vs 27.0) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $1528; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.8 | 27.0 | −36.9% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 36.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,557.04 | $1,528.20 | −1.9% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 1.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.02s | 56.90s | +72.3% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 72.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium): 36.9% less intelligence, 1.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Medium)Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/kimi-k2-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/kimi-k2-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill