Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 21.0 points higher (42.8 vs 21.8) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.8 | 21.8 | −49.1% MiMo-V2.5 is 49.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,557.04 | $61.93 | −96.0% MiMo-V2.5 is 96.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.09s | 53.94s | +63.0% MiMo-V2.5 is 63.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Grok 4.6 (Medium): 49.1% less intelligence, 96.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Grok 4.6 (Medium)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill