Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 25.3 points higher (42.8 vs 17.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.8 | 17.5 | −59.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 59.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,557.04 | $145.77 | −90.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 90.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.02s | 24.78s | −25.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 25.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium): 59.1% less intelligence, 90.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Grok 4.6 (Medium)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill