Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 18.7 points higher (42.8 vs 24.1) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $502; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.8 | 24.1 | −43.7% Solar Mini 4 is 43.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,557.04 | $502.02 | −67.8% Solar Mini 4 is 67.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.37s | 27.46s | −12.5% Solar Mini 4 is 12.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Grok 4.6 (Medium): 43.7% less intelligence, 67.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Grok 4.6 (Medium)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill