Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 0.9 points higher (45.1 vs 44.2) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2359 vs $2242; both flagship class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 45.1 | +2.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $2,358.74 | +5.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 5.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.23s | 28.35s | −40.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 40.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 2.0% more intelligence, 5.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill