Grok 4.6 (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 1.5 points higher (44.3 vs 42.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $1557; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Medium).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 42.8 | −3.4% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 3.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $1,557.04 | −20.7% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 20.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.57s | 33.09s | −7.0% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 7.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 3.4% less intelligence, 20.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (High)Grok 4.6 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill