Grok 4.6 (High) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 14.2 points higher (44.3 vs 30.1) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $1190; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 30.1 | −32.1% Kimi K3 (Low) is 32.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $1,190.42 | −39.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 39.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 34.90s | 56.42s | +61.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 61.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 32.1% less intelligence, 39.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (High)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill