Grok 4.6 (High) vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 33.5 points higher (44.3 vs 10.8) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $105; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (High) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 10.8 | −75.6% Mercury 2 is 75.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $104.94 | −94.7% Mercury 2 is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.72s | 8.08s | −74.5% Mercury 2 is 74.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2 vs Grok 4.6 (High): 75.6% less intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
Grok 4.6 (High)Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill