Grok 4.6 (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 8.1 points higher (52.4 vs 44.3) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1963; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 52.4 | +18.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 18.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $5,786.78 | +194.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.72s | 41.43s | +30.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 30.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 18.3% more intelligence, 194.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.6 (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill