Grok 4.7 (High) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 19.3 points higher (46.3 vs 27.0) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1528; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 27.0 | −41.7% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 41.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $1,528.20 | −60.6% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 60.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.34s | 56.90s | +124.5% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 124.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 41.7% less intelligence, 60.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 124.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.7 (High)Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/kimi-k2-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/kimi-k2-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill