Grok 4.7 (High) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 20.3 points higher (46.3 vs 26.0) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 26.0 | −43.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 43.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $231.08 | −94.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 94.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.21s | 49.58s | +96.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 96.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 43.8% less intelligence, 94.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (High)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill