Grok 4.7 (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Grok 4.7 (High): the same intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 46.3 | Even |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $206.66 | −94.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.34s | 48.29s | +90.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 90.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.7 (High)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill