Grok 4.7 (High) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 40.3 points higher (46.3 vs 6.0) but costs 103× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $37.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 6.0 | −87.0% Ministral 3 14B is 87.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $37.56 | −99.0% Ministral 3 14B is 99.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 51.53s | 8.02s | −84.4% Ministral 3 14B is 84.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Grok 4.7 (High): 87.0% less intelligence, 99.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Grok 4.7 (High)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill