Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Ling-flash-2.0

Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Ling-flash-2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

SpaceXAIGrok 4.7 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.20
Total cost
$1631
InclusionAILing-flash-2.0Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGrok 4.7 (Low)Ling-flash-2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)42.27.8−81.5% Ling-flash-2.0 is 81.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,630.69Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.39s112.65s+809.2% Ling-flash-2.0 is 809.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $6.00$0.14 / $0.57
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGrok 4.7 (Low): what beats itLing-flash-2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/ling-flash-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/ling-flash-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill