Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 31.4 points higher (42.2 vs 10.8) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $105; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 10.8 | −74.4% Mercury 2 is 74.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $104.94 | −93.6% Mercury 2 is 93.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 6.65s | −51.2% Mercury 2 is 51.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2 vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 74.4% less intelligence, 93.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill