Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 35.2 points higher (42.2 vs 7.0) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 7.0 | −83.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 83.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $121.78 | −92.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 92.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 12.77s | −6.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 6.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 83.4% less intelligence, 92.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill