Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 15.8% more intelligence, 94.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 31.1 | 36.0 | +15.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 15.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,168.65 | $117.12 | −94.6% Muse Ember (Max) is 94.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.41s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill