Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 24.7 points higher (42.2 vs 17.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 17.5 | −58.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 58.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $145.77 | −91.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 91.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.28s | 24.76s | +119.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 119.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 58.5% less intelligence, 91.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 119.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill