Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 6.2 points higher (46.4 vs 40.2) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $3172; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 Max.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.4 | 40.2 | −13.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 13.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,967.35 | $3,172.37 | −36.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 36.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.88s | 64.17s | +39.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 39.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh): 13.4% less intelligence, 36.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill