Grok Build 0.1 0616 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)

Grok Build 0.1 0616 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

SpaceXAIGrok Build 0.1 0616Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
27.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1165
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGrok Build 0.1 0616Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)27.226.2−3.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 3.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,164.93— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)25.51s55.08s+115.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 115.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.00 / $2.00$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGrok Build 0.1 0616: what beats itQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-build-0-1-06-16/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-build-0-1-06-16/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill