Hy3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Hy3: 27.3% less intelligence, 528.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 18.4 | −27.3% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 27.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $940.97 | +528.9% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 6.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.69s | 64.60s | +91.7% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 91.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Hy3Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill