Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 14.9 points higher (40.2 vs 25.3) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $150; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 40.2 | +58.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 58.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $3,172.37 | +2020.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 21× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 62.83s | +88.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 88.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Hy3: 58.9% more intelligence, 2020.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Hy3Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill