Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Inkling 2 Small: 11.4% more intelligence, 87.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 34.1 | +11.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 11.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $95.73 | −87.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 87.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.92s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Inkling 2 SmallMuse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill