Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 24.3 points higher (30.6 vs 6.3) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $182; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling 2 Small when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 6.3 | −79.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 79.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $181.95 | −77.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 77.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 23.54s | +12.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 12.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Inkling 2 Small: 79.4% less intelligence, 77.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 29.90 for $121.
Inkling 2 SmallMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill