Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Wonder (High)
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Wonder (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (High) scores 9.9 points higher (40.5 vs 30.6) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3520 vs $792; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (High) when you need intelligence above 30.6, and Inkling 2 Small when 30.6 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Muse Wonder (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 40.5 | +32.4% Muse Wonder (High) is 32.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $3,520.18 | +344.6% Muse Wonder (High) is 4.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 30.79s | +47.2% Muse Wonder (High) is 47.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (High) vs Inkling 2 Small: 32.4% more intelligence, 344.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Wonder (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 54.80 for $3204.
Inkling 2 SmallMuse Wonder (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-wonder-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-wonder-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill