Inkling Small vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 0.1 points higher (25.8 vs 25.7) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $241; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 25.7, and Inkling Small when 25.7 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 25.8 | +0.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 0.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $992.88 | +312.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.67s | 46.75s | +269.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 269.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Inkling Small: 0.4% more intelligence, 312.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 269.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Inkling SmallKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill