Inkling Small vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 1.8 points higher (43.0 vs 41.2) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $193; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Inkling Small.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 43.0 | +4.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $192.52 | $544.58 | +182.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.30s | 75.91s | +93.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 93.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Inkling Small: 4.4% more intelligence, 182.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
Inkling SmallKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill