Inkling Small vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Inkling Small
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Inkling Small: 44.7% less intelligence, 424.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 14.2 | −44.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 44.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $1,263.80 | +424.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.68s | 17.66s | +39.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 39.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Inkling SmallMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill