Inkling Small vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 13.9 points higher (39.6 vs 25.7) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $241; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.7, and Inkling Small when 25.7 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 39.6 | +54.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 54.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $1,385.40 | +475.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.95s | 20.60s | +59.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 59.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Inkling Small: 54.1% more intelligence, 475.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Inkling SmallMuse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill