Inkling Small vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 13.2 points higher (38.9 vs 25.7) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $241; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.7, and Inkling Small when 25.7 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 38.9 | +51.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 51.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $1,184.90 | +392.0% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.68s | 17.34s | +36.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 36.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Inkling Small: 51.4% more intelligence, 392.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Inkling SmallMuse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill