Inkling Small vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Inkling Small
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Inkling Small: 39.3% less intelligence, 174.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 15.6 | −39.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 39.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $661.29 | +174.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.95s | 21.43s | +65.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 65.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Inkling SmallQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill