Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 21.1 points higher (48.1 vs 27.0) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1528; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 27.0 | 48.1 | +78.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 78.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,528.20 | $2,000.35 | +30.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 30.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.90s | 75.86s | +33.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 33.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning): 78.1% more intelligence, 30.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill