Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 28.5 points higher (43.0 vs 14.5) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $35.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 14.5, and Llama 4 Maverick when 14.5 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 14.5 | −66.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 66.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $35.92 | −93.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 93.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 5.43s | −91.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 91.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.27 / $0.85 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 66.3% less intelligence, 93.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill