Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 17.0 points higher (26.3 vs 9.3) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $45.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 9.3 | −64.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 64.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $45.50 | −95.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 95.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 6.30s | −84.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 84.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.26 / $0.91 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 64.6% less intelligence, 95.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill